Journalist Ranjeni Munusamy wants to see the face of the police officer who claimed that the police’s crime intelligence fund had paid for repairs to her car.

In an affidavit to cross-examine Lieutenant General Dhanajaya Gangulu Naidoo at the Zondo commission of inquiry into state capture, she denied that she had asked for any repairs to her vehicle.

Munusamy also denied that she even knew of any repairs, and that if her car had been repaired, she did not know where the money came from.

“As Colonel Naidoo testified in camera, I seek a further order that I may be granted leave to have sight of Colonel Naidoo or a photograph of him which has been approved by the chairperson in accordance with the order made by the chairperson of the commission on September 26, 2019,” her affidavit to the commission read. 

Naidoo claimed on his first day in the hot seat that Munusamy was a confidante of former crime intelligence head General Mulangi Mphego, and that a R40 000 repair bill to Ranjeni’s car was covered by crime intelligence’s Secret Services Account (SSA).

READ: Zondo commission: Police whistleblower details how journalists, including Ranjeni Munusamy, were allegedly paid by crime intelligence officers

His face was not shown as he is in a witness protection programme.

Munusamy said she did have a scare though when coming out of a shopping centre in 2008 or 2009. 

She said when she got to her car she found that all four tyres were flat and this shook her because it had never happened before.

Petrol attendants, who helped her, told her the tyres had not been slashed, and so they inflated them and she went home.

However, it left her feeling anxious and distressed and among the people she called was SA Communist Party secretary-general Blade Nzimande to talk about it.

He said she should report it to the police, but she did not want to go to the police station because she did not think they would take her seriously over deflated tyres.

In her affidavit, Munusamy described herself as a “major” journalist, saying she objected to Naidoo’s testimony about her and wanted to cross-examine him. 

READ MORE: ‘I did not benefit from any of the said funds’ – journalist Ranjeni Munusamy on state capture

“The above allegations are extremely serious and have the potential to destroy my reputation as a reputable journalist.

“Indeed, they have already done considerable damage to my reputation.

“… At the outset, I wish to make it clear that I deny having been involved in any act of corruption, bribery, fraud or money laundering.” 

Munusamy denied “knowingly” receiving funds from the secret service account, or knowing that her car was repaired by them, or that the cost of the repairs were being covered by funds from the account.

“I do not know why Colonel Naidoo seeks to malign me in this way.” 

She submitted that the commission should not rely on Naidoo’s testimony, and demanded that he supply the documentation that he claimed to have to prove his claims against her.

Munusamy said that between October 2004 and April 2012 she did not work as a journalist, and focused on public relations. 

Between 2004 and 2009, she ran her own communications business, doing public relations, media training and political research; from July 2009 to October 2010, she worked at the higher education and training department as communications head. 

In 2011, she worked at McCann MSP doing public relations, and returned to journalism, also in 2011, as a sub-editor at the Daily Maverick. 

She joined her current employer, Tiso Blackstar, in 2017.

Munusamy stated that after the tyre incident and speaking to Nzimande, she called an acquaintance, Lieutenant General Raymond Lalla who she knew from covering political violence in KwaZulu-Natal.

He expressed concern and said he would get his colleague, Mphego who she had met while covering the Boeremag stories in 2000, to assist. 

Mphego called her to say Lalla had spoken to him and she told the story about the deflated tyres again.

Mphego said another police officer would assist her.

Munusamy could not remember if this was the same night or the next day. 

She later received a call from a man whose name she does not remember, saying he had been told she was having car trouble, and asked for her address. 

He took her car away, and then returned it.

All she remembers of him is that he was an Indian male. 

“I will likely be able to confirm this when I see a photograph of him.” 

Munusamy let the man take the car for an inspection and trusted him because she trusted Lalla.

“To me the vehicle was returned in the exact same condition in which it left,” she submitted.

ALSO READ: ‘My vehicle was settled by close family friend,’ says Munusamy, who intends to cross-examine witnesses at Zondo commission

“… I stress that I was not aware at all that any money had been spent by anyone – much less crime intelligence – to repair anything on my car.” 

Of Mphego, she denied being his confidante or adviser, or anybody’s “confidante” for that matter.

She said she was also never provided with an invoice for any of the supposed work done, and her legal team had not yet been able to obtain a copy of this supposed invoice for the work.

“I value my credibility as a journalist and I am horrified by the allegations that I benefited from being paid by the SSA”. 

Munusamy has already denied that crime intelligence paid her car off, saying it was settled by a close family friend, Basheer Ahmed Abdool.

More than two years since their arrest, the trial of farmers Johannes Potgieter, 33, and Hendrick Dumas, 48, who allegedly handcuffed a 9-year-old girl to a tree before beating her and firing shots at her, is finally under way.

At the start of the trial in the Pretoria Magistrate’s Court last week, Potgieter and Dumas pleaded not guilty to several charges.

The girl was the first State witness to take the stand and she is testifying in camera (behind closed doors) because she is a minor.

She continued testifying on Wednesday but members of the media and the public were barred from attending.

READ: Alleged farm assault victim, 9, still too traumatised to give formal statement, court hears

Both farmers have been charged with kidnapping, assault with intent to do grievous bodily harm and the unlawful pointing of a firearm.

Potgieter faces four charges of attempted murder as he allegedly shot at the victim, her 11-year-old brother and two of their friends.

Dumas faces two attempted murder charges.

The girl’s brother and two friends are also witnesses in the case and are expected to testify in camera if they are called to give evidence.

State’s version

According to the State, the victim and three other children were walking their dogs on September 9, 2017 near Bronkhorstspruit when the dogs ran onto a farm to chase guineafowl.

The children followed the dogs onto the farm where they were allegedly accosted by Dumas and Potgieter. Three of the children escaped, leaving the 9-year-old behind, who was allegedly tied to a tree, shot at and assaulted.

Still tormented by incident

The father of the girl previously told News24 that his daughter was tormented by what happened and asked every day when the trial would be over.

“She is scared that they will come for her again because they are free,” he said.

The girl’s father said she shudders and shivers whenever she sees a white person and hides whenever she passes by the farm where the alleged incident took place.

“If she just sees a white person, she shivers. Their farm is just on the road,” the man said.

The men were initially refused bail. However, they were later released on bail of R3 000 after they succeeded in an appeal to the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria in October 2018.