Each year more than 25 million women around the world have unsafe abortions, according to a report launched on Wednesday by the Guttmacher-Lancet Commission in Johannesburg.

And while the report, intended to put sexual and reproductive health and rights on top of the global public health agenda, praises South Africa’s liberal abortion laws, activists have lambasted the government for failing to turn policy into a reality on the ground.

“We have roughly 8 000 health facilities, how many of them offer termination of pregnancy?” asked Justice Edwin Cameron at the launch. “Only 270, that’s just 7%.”

Extremely limited access to abortion

Referring to a recent Amnesty International report that noted that less than one in 10 of South African public health facilities offers women access to their legally-entrenched right to terminate their pregnancies, Cameron criticised Minister of Health Aaron Motsoaledi for public comments he has made in the past implying that women use abortion as a means of contraception.

“How do we go from this beautifully drafted Mandela-era statute to implementation?” he asked, referring to the Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act signed into law by former health minister Nkosazana Dlamini-Zumu over two decades ago in 1996 under the presidency of Nelson Mandela.

According to head of Section27 Mark Heywood this “extremely limited” access to abortion in the country “is a violation of women’s human rights that ultimately leads to loss of life” as many women seek out illegal abortion providers as their only accessible option.

Illegal abortions have high complication rates including death. According to the report almost 7-million women “in developing countries sought treatment for complications from an unsafe induced abortion in 2012”.

Another major hurdle

Dr Manala Makua, acting director for women, child and sexual and reproductive health at the National Department of Health told Health-e News that they are aware of the problem but that opposition from certain parties and health workers “are hurdles”.

In December 2017 the African Christian Democratic Party put forward a bill in Parliament aimed at further decreasing access to abortion in the country.

Makua said that the department’s rejection of this bill, which would require women seeking an abortion to undergo an ultrasound and see their foetus, should be heralded as a “success”.

“We can’t afford any more restrictions,” she admitted.

She said that the another major “hurdle” is that many health workers refused to perform abortions on moral, religious and cultural grounds.

“But termination of pregnancy has nothing to do with morality and is an extremely complex issue that can often be related to contraception failure and gender-based violence,” she said.

Women facing stigma

She added that the department was facilitating bi-annual national workshops with health workers on “values clarifications” and “debriefing” because “providers need support”.

“They need debriefing and motivation to keep going and to understand the context of women seeking these services,” she said.

But Heywood said that while these trainings “are important, they are just not enough”.

“We need a public commitment from the Minister of Health that this is a serious problem.”

He compared the stigma that women seeking abortions in South Africa face to the stigma experienced by people “in the old days of HIV”.

He said: “The Department of Health needs to conduct a proper audit of abortion access at health facilities as a matter of urgency because this is a pervasive but unrecognised disaster, a disaster predominantly affecting poor black women.” – Health-e News.

^{Image credit: iStock}

Amy Green